Federal Circuit Confirms That PTAB Patentability Findings Do Not Have Issue

The Federal Circuit recently vacated a summary judgment ruling of invalidity, holding that the district court erred in applying preclusive effect to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s unpatentability findings regarding other claims in the same patent. In doing so, the Federal Circuit reiterated that issue preclusion does not apply where the prior factual determinations were made under a lower standard of proof.

The claims asserted by the patent owner in the district court consisted […]

By | November 12th, 2025 ||

The Patent Eligibility Restoration Act: Revisions To Section 101 Moving Closer To The Finish Line

The Subcommittee on Intellectual Property of the Senate Judiciary Committee recently took another step towards moving forward with a redefinition of patent-eligible subject matter under Section 101 of the Patent Act when it held a hearing to consider the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2025 (PERA), introduced on a bipartisan basis by Senators Coons (D-DE) and Tillis (R-NC).

PERA is hardly new; substantially similar laws were proposed in each year since 2022. But momentum may […]

By | November 8th, 2025 ||

Untimely Disclosure Leads To Loss Of Defense

The longer you hold a fact, defense or claim in secret, the greater the chance you will never get to use it. In this case, a “perfunctory” pleading with no invalidity contention bolstering led to the loss of an obviousness-type double patenting invalidity defense. Takeaway: make sure all defenses are adequately and timely disclosed.

Bosch’s answer states that “[e]ach of the claims of the Patents-in-Suit is invalid and/or unenforceable for failure to satisfy the conditions […]

By | November 5th, 2025 ||